|
Relationship Between Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Antibodies and
Exacerbation of Renal Disease in Patients With Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus
Matthew D. Linnik, Jay Z. Hu, Kenneth R. Heilbrunn, Vibeke Strand,
Frank L. Hurley,
Tenshang Joh, and the LJP 394 Investigator Consortium
Objective: To examine the relationship between changes
in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels and the
risk of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE), using data from 2 randomized, controlled trials.
Methods: Analyses were based on 487 patients with SLE and
a history of lupus nephritis who had an anti-dsDNA antibody titer
≥15 IU/ml at baseline, as measured by Farr assay. Results are
presented for the combined population of patients, the placebo
arms, and the drug treatment arms in which a dsDNA-based bioconjugate
(abetimus sodium; LJP 394) was used.
Results: Changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels were inversely
correlated with changes in the C3 level (P < 0.0001 for both
trials). Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that
changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels correlated with the risk
of renal flare. The models predicted that a point estimate of
a 50% reduction in anti-dsDNA antibody levels is associated with
a 52% reduction (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 26-68%, nominal
P = 0.0007) and a 53% reduction (95% CI 33-69%, nominal P <
0.0001) in the risk of renal flare in the 2 trials, respectively.
In the 2 trials, the incidence of renal flare was lower in patients
with sustained reductions in anti-dsDNA antibodies (3.0% and 4.1%,
respectively) than in patients with stable or increasing antibody
levels (21.3% and 20.3%, respectively).
Conclusion: Changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels were directly
correlated with the risk of renal flare and inversely correlated
with changes in the C3 level. Reducing anti-dsDNA antibody levels
may represent a therapeutic objective in SLE patients with lupus
nephritis, because it is associated with a reduced risk of renal
flare.
Published in
Arthritis & Rheumatism
April 2005
Volume 52, No. 4, pp1129-1137
|