|
RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE III CLINICAL
TRIAL FOR THE EVALUATION OF LJP 394 (ABETIMUS SODIUM) IN THE TREATMENT
OF PATIENTS WITH SLE WHO ARE AT RISK FOR RENAL FLARE
Mario Cardiel for the LJP 394-90-09 Study Investigators Group
Background:
LJP 394 is an immunomodulatory agent that was designed to delay
SLE renal disease and prevent renal flares by selectively inducing
B cell tolerance in anti-dsDNA B cells and reducing circulating
levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Anti-dsDNA antibodies are believed
to contribute to the development of lupus nephritis, a major cause
of morbidity and mortality in SLE patients. In a previous study
of LJP 394 approximately 90% of enrolled patients were noted to
have high affinity antibodies to the oligonucleotide epitope of
LJP 394 at baseline. Of these 189 patients, those treated with
LJP 394 experienced significantly longer time to renal flare,
fewer renal flares, and longer time to initiation of high-dose
corticosteroids or cyclophosphamide when compared with placebo.
The present study was designed to assess these preliminary findings
and further evaluate the safety of LJP 394.
Objectives:
The primary objective was to determine whether LJP 394 100 mg
weekly was more effective than placebo in delaying renal flares
in patients with high-affinity antibodies and a history of SLE
renal disease. A secondary objective was to determine if LJP 394
was more effective than placebo in delaying time to initiation
of treatment with cyclophosphamide and/or high-dose corticosteroids.
Methods:
Patients were eligible for participation if they had had a documented
renal flare within the past four years, had no evidence of active
SLE renal disease within the past three months and had a Farr
level of > 15 IU/mL. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio
to receive either LJP 394 100 mg IV or placebo weekly for a period
of up to 22 months.
Outcome measurements:
A protocol-defined renal flare required that it be attributed
to SLE and that it satisfied one or more of the following three
criteria: (1) a reproducible increase in serum creatinine of >
20% or at least 0.3 mg/dL, whichever is greater, and accompanied
by significant proteinuria and/or hematuria and/or red cell casts,
(2) a reproducible increase in 24-hr urine protein, or (3) new
reproducible hematuria or a reproducible 2-grade increase in hematuria
compared to baseline, with > 25% dysmorphic red blood cells,
and either an 800 mg increase 24-hr protein or new red cell casts.
All renal flares were blindly adjudicated by an independent Renal
Events Committe. In addition, incidence of renal flare, incidence
of cyclophosphamide and/or high-dose corticosteroid use, and time
to, and incidence of, major SLE flares were also measured. Quality
of life assessments included SF-36 and patient self-assessments.
Results:
The trial ended in December 2002. Seventy-two clinical sites in
North America and Europe enrolled a total of 317 patients of whom
298 (94%) were determined to have had high affinity antibodies
to LJP 394 at baseline. There were 41 renal flares in patients
with high-affinity antibodies and five renal flares in patients
with low-affinity antibodies. The average time in study for patients
was approximately 11 months. At the time this abstract was prepared,
the study remained blinded.
Conclusion:
This recently completed phase III study will assess the safety
and effectiveness of LJP 394, a potential new treatment for patients
with SLE who are at risk for renal flare.
Presented at the
Annual European Congress of Rheumatology "EULAR 2003"
Lisbon, Portugal
June 18-21, 2003

|